Register now for "Tell Her Story: Women in Scripture and History!" Spots are still available! Click here to learn more!

Published Date: March 9, 2020

Published Date: March 9, 2020

Featured Articles

Like What You’re Reading?

Click to help create more!

Get CBE’s blog in your inbox!

CBE Abuse Resource

Cover of "Created to Thrive".

Featured Articles

Dying for Love: Talking about Domestic Violence on International Women’s Day

Editor’s Note: Trigger Warning. Descriptions of domestic violence appear in this article.

International Women’s Day arrives every year on March 8, but has anything changed for women since last year’s International Women’s Day? I ask this question because in Australia we are reeling under the shock of the horrific murders of Hannah Clarke (31) and her three young children, Aaliyah (6), Laianah (4), and Trey (3). They were killed on February 19, 2020, by her husband and the children’s father, Rowan Baxter. He doused them with gasoline and set them on fire in the family car. They appeared to the world as a glamorous couple with three beautiful children, but in the home, Rowan was, as his sister-in-law said, “a monster.” He always wanted his own way and was controlling. Hannah lived in fear of him and went to the police for help several times; she even had a court order against him. Nevertheless, she is dead and so are her three children. In her greatest time of need no one could do anything, and her husband killed her and their three children in the most appalling way. Since this woman would not live with him, or recognize his authority over her, and she wanted to take his children from him, he decided to kill them all.

This is almost too much to get our heads around, but to make things worse the police inspector in charge of the case, Mark Thompson, said it was possibly all Hannah’s fault. Speaking the day after the murders, he said, “to put it bluntly,” we are “deciding which side to take.” He added that the police are “opened minded” at the moment. His statement almost inspires the public to question the victim: Which side are you on? Is this an issue of a woman suffering significant domestic violence and her and her children perishing at the hands of a violent and angry man, or is this an instance of a man being driven too far by his wife who wouldn’t do as he demanded? In other words, was this an awful, violent, and willful crime against a defenseless woman and her children, or did this woman deserve it? Had she driven her husband to do this because of her own actions?

The next day, the Queensland Police Commissioner, who happens to be a woman, Katrina Carrol, took Inspector Thompson off the case and apologized for what he had said. No matter what any woman does, no husband has the right to be violent towards his wife, let alone kill her. In this case, Hannah Clarke’s “sin” was to leave her dominating and controlling husband because she feared for her own safety and that of her children.

On average, one woman a week in Australia is killed by a man who says he loves her. The prevalence of domestic violence is staggering. The figures are breathtaking and hard to believe. An unimaginable number of women’s lives are blighted by this scourge. In the US, Europe, and Australia, one in four women will experience physical abuse from an intimate partner in their lifetime. The incidence of abuse in Australia is even higher among immigrants and those of aboriginal and Torres Island descent. No change in these statistics is in sight; they may even be getting worse. The more freedoms women enjoy, the stronger the pushback by men who believe that as men they should be in charge. In the research we have, the incidence of domestic abuse in society seems to be paralleled in church-going families and possibly elevated in churches where it is regularly taught that the man is the head of the home, so he should make all the important decisions, and the wife should be subordinate.

“Domestic abuse” is a specific phenomenon. It does not refer to an incidence of abusive language and possibly a slap, which is commonly called “situational couple violence,” and is not characterized by ongoing controlling patterns of behavior. Domestic abuse refers to the ongoing assertion of power, almost always by a man over his wife or intimate partner, that has as its intent the complete control of the woman. Domestic abuse is always ultimately about power in one way or another; the man feels he must be in control. His male identity as a leader must be asserted. Australian journalist and author Jess Hill says, “The unifying ingredient among abusers is a radioactive sense of entitlement,” which can be summed up in the sentiment: “I should be in charge.” Women do kill their husbands on rare occasions, but it is more often to preserve their own life and often the lives of their children as well. Women do not pour gasoline on their husbands and children and set them on fire. Domestic abuse always involves control and fear but not necessarily physical violence. Domestic abuse is gender specific. It’s a male thing.

Why do some men, and some men who are in church most Sundays, we ask, abuse their wives? We now know the primary reason. It is well-put by professors Lori Heise and Andreas Kotsadam in their 2015 Lancet article, “Cross-National and Multilevel Correlates of Partner Abuse,” based on sixty-six surveys in forty-four countries and involving 481 subjects. They found that “especially predictive . . . of partner violence are norms related to male authority.” In other words, when it is believed that men are privileged and should be in control, women are abused in much higher percentages. Similarly, Jess Hill in her 2019 book, See What You Made Me DoPower, Control, and Domestic Abuse, says, “It is indisputable that traditional notions of masculinity—particularly male entitlement—are at the core of men’s violence against women.” Our Watch, the Australian organization set up specifically to combat domestic abuse, says, “Research has consistently found that men who hold traditional, hierarchical views about gender roles and relationships are more likely to perpetrate violence against women.”

What this means for churches is that teaching that men should be “real men,” and women “real women,” that men should be in charge, that men make all the important decisions, can be a very dangerous diet for some men—men who are needy and controlling. What we should be hearing in our churches is that God has made men and women of equal dignity, status, and leadership potential (Gen. 1:27–28). We should be hearing that Jesus in word and deed valued men and women alike and said not one word on male “headship,” and the apostle Paul taught that a husband should love his wife like Christ loved the church and gave his life for her (Eph. 5:25). What is distinctively Christian and new in Paul’s teaching on marriage in Ephesians 5 is his call for mutual subordination (Eph. 5:21).

If International Women’s Day is going to mean anything, national leaders, especially politicians, need to unite and say that the abuse of women must stop. And, church leaders, especially theologians, must oppose the idea that in the home the man should make all the important decisions, that he is to be the boss. We do not want another Hannah Clarke murdered by her husband.