BEING FEMINIST AND PRO-FAMILY

Lynn Marcotte

Today, many believers are finding themselves at odds with each other about the family, gender-defined roles, and how the two intertwine. Women may find themselves gifted with the ability to teach or lead but find almost no context for those gifts within their churches. Men may prefer teaching children in Sunday School to organizing a missions conference, but instead get stuck doing the very things for which they have no vision, just because it is expected of them as men. As they marry and bear children and as their lives incarnate their Christian faith, both men and women may find themselves constricted by the traditional roles mapped out for them by their churches.

Like many women in the church today, I wear several hats: wife, mother, and professional. Even though I find support for those roles within my own church, I am discovering that my experience is rare and that what women and men should do about marriage, family, and work is a heated issue. There seem to be two camps vying for our allegiance today: the pro-family movement and feminism. And, according to some, a Christian can’t be both pro-family and feminist.

The issues look something like this: First, there’s the pro-family movement, which is interested in supporting and sustaining the traditional family. It is thus committed to social and political issues related to the sustenance of the family because it thinks family life is being undermined and devalued. According to pro-family advocates, this deterioration is caused by such practices as widespread cohabitation, no-fault divorce, joint custody of children, blurred gender roles, government intrusion into the family, and the rampant growth of child-care centers. Many people who are active in the pro-family movement find a biblical basis for maintaining what they deem traditional family life and for fighting politically against its deterioration.

Then there is feminism. It believes that men and women should be treated as equals—socially, economically, and politically. Throughout history, women in a variety of cultures have been expected to submit to a prescribed set of behaviors, and as a result have suffered varying levels of mistreatment, both subtle and profound. Out of a deep frustration by what has historically happened to women and by what they presently experience, feminists are vocal, active, and adamant about change. The old system, the so-called traditional ways, cannot support equality of the sexes, so feminists are agitating for a new paradigm of human relationships. There’s a deep fear of regression or minimal change, so they are fighting for sweeping change. They want a new paradigm.

This new paradigm, feminists say, could ultimately be freeing for both men and women. Like pro-family advocates, feminists have broadened the issues at stake. Not wanting to let government, society and men control them any longer, many women are demanding an environment where they have control over their bodies and their lives. So, inevitably, issues like abortion, birth control, divorce, day-care, and welfare benefits have come into the discussions. Like pro-family advocates, many feminists find a biblical basis for changing both society and the church.

I find it easy to get confused when I look at the agendas of both the pro-family movement and the feminist movement. Some of the things feminists often advocate, such as no-fault divorce laws or legalized abortion, are the very things pro-family advocates are alarmed about. Likewise, some of the things the pro-family movement seems to encourage, like a hierarchy dictated by gender, have the feminists disturbed.

As a wife and mother, I have little use for the traditional roles the pro-family movement thinks are so crucial to the health of family life. Neither does my husband. Yet, my husband and I are committed to making our home a healthy, stable place for our children and ourselves. We make decisions together, we are both equally responsible for our children’s well being, and we both find we need work that gives us a sense of satisfaction and purpose.

In our own home, for example, my husband and I feel we should be the primary caregivers to our children, ages one and four, rather than turn them over all day to persons outside the home. As it has turned out, one of us is the primary breadwinner and one takes care of the children while the other works; to us it doesn’t matter which one of us works or which one of us takes care of the kids. What we value is that we are the ones who are the most involved with our children. This may not work out for everyone, but it is our own vision for keeping our family healthy and intact.

If someone observed the way my husband and I function in our relationship and in our home, we look very “traditional” at times and we look very “feminist” at times. It depends on who is looking and when. This seems to be true for many Christian families. But the point is this: as we evaluate how best to nurture family life, we cannot be quick to judge and criticize those who may be doing a fine job, just because the way they do it may not look the way we do it. That’s not to say that we shouldn’t be critical as Christians when we look at our culture and its values, or that we shouldn’t be open to criticism and change. But we shouldn’t be critical about the wrong things or too stubborn to change.

I believe that living in families is something God affirms. Men and women marry, they raise children, they are a family. This is at the basis of God’s creation. We can try to change it slightly or drastically, we can struggle to live up to our commitments and responsibilities, we can fail miserably at it, or we may not even be called to it, but the family is here to stay.

I also believe that men and women are equal. Our sins, our weaknesses, our strengths, and our gifts are equal. They are not necessarily the same, but they are equal. The first time I grasped the real meaning of Paul’s writings on the subject in Galatians, I was elated: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” One woman’s gift is different from another woman’s, just as one man’s gift is different from another man’s, but one specific gift or weakness is no better or worse than another. And God, not being a respecter of persons, is not biased toward one sex or the other. Women and men can teach, encourage, guide, and exhort. And, women and men can be taught, encouraged, and led. Scripture continually supports these notions, and many good studies exist that have researched the New Testament’s treatment of women and gifts.

When I look at my own life and the experiences of those in my church, I just don’t perceive the feminist and pro-family viewpoints as complete opposites. In fact, I think they both ultimately want the same things: a healthy society where both men and women can live at their full potentials, where families find support and encouragement, where fidelity between husbands and wives is valued, and where bearing and raising children is valued. It has made me wonder what these movements have done to polarize each other so drastically and so weaken the important goals of each.

One thing that has alienated me at times—and I sense has polarized many Christians—is “that word.” Many believers, even though they practice mutuality of the sexes, are afraid to admit it or label it or be active in a movement for change in the church because they are afraid of “that word.” They are afraid of being labeled and thus judged by the standards of “that word.” Choosing between the two camps is a dilemma that faces many Christians, and to many it seems far more “spiritual” to be pro-family than feminist (ah, there, I named it). If we Christians can just overcome our fear of that word and embrace what we know God wants for both men and women, then we can actively and fervently be part of the transformation God is working in the church today.

A way to begin overcoming this fear is by understanding what feminism actually is. As one dictionary tells it, feminism is the theory of political, economic, and social equality of the sexes. For Christians, we can add spiritual equality. I think I would be hard pressed to find someone who didn’t support those ideas. Feminism is also an organized activity on behalf of women’s rights and interests. The second definition has come to be the sum total of feminism in many people’s minds. And, this “feminism,” along with the good it has produced, also carries with it an excess baggage of doctrine and reputation that many people hesitate to support.

I may not agree with everything that the different wings of the feminist movement have done or hope to do, but I don’t have a problem sorting that out. We need to have an intelligent faith that is not afraid to look at the movement and trust the Holy Spirit to help us discern what is part of God’s plan and what is not.

Likewise, I find that I can be pro-family without accepting lock, stock, and barrel everything the pro-family movement finds necessary to our well-being. It is possible to be pro-family and not support an archaic hierarchy of male/female roles.

This whole idea of the “traditional family” as an ideal has only existed since the Industrial Revolution. So to go back to a supposed ideal that was lived out for such a short period of time is not only historically inaccurate but is certainly biblically naïve. It doesn’t even attend to the economic realities of our lives.

Most men and women work because they have to, so they can provide food, clothing, and shelter for their families. And it’s not a glamorous life out there for the majority of workers. Women are not listlessly eating their chocolates, watching soap operas, and saying, “Oh this life’s a bore, I think I’ll find a job.” The hard economic reality is that many women work because they must.

Yet, pro-family advocates insist that family life is doomed to a slow death unless we re-establish the male headship over the home and the female submission to that headship, which often means men must work and women must not. They insist that we will be blurring our sexual identity and the identity of our children if men and women can do the same activities, instead of doing a set of pre-ordained ones.

Are feminists and pro-family advocates then part of separate camps, enemies to one another? Does the baggage they carry require that we choose one over the other?

Some say I am naïve in thinking I can be part of both camps. Pro-family advocates insist that the many issues, from sexual identity to pro-life concerns and a narrow definition of family, are all related and biblically founded, and must all be embraced to save the family from deterioration. Likewise, feminists give the impression that for women and men to experience true equality we must support abortion on demand and re-define the family.

I believe that unless both camps realize they agree on some basic things and can acknowledge that certain values are crucial to all concerned, neither will be as successful as they would like in changing our culture. In fact, being both feminist and pro-family can look quite different from being only one or the other. We don’t need to force an impossible agreement between the feminist and pro-family movements. Instead, we need to start by being critical in our thinking and realize that there are things on both sides that don’t belong in a “pro-family/feminist movement.” And, there are also some things that do. As we undergo this process, I believe we will be transformed into people who understand the evolution of the issues and show compassion toward the individuals who, to us, seem to overreact. As Christians, we should be most concerned with love, forgiveness, and compassion, rather than with dogmatic adherence to a set of lifeless regulations. That also holds true as we allow God to transform us into being pro-family and feminist.

To be people who are both pro-family and feminist means being non-judgmental yet discerning. It means, for example, understanding that something must be very wrong with society’s treatment of women to put them in a predicament of having to use abortion as birth control. We may not support abortion on demand, but we can have a gentle spirit toward women faced with unwanted pregnancies. Instead of judging the victim, we should try to change society so that there are fewer victims. Actually, it has always seemed ironic to me that the feminist movement wants a humanized world with equal rights for all, yet it is adamant that the right of a woman to get an abortion overrides the right of the child she bears.

Those who are pro-family and feminist value biblical principles of commitment and marriage, yet are compassionate towards individuals in other lifestyles. We are alarmed by the soaring divorce rate, the lax acceptance of homosexuality and cohabitation, and the lack of commitment in today’s marriages and families. Yet we are compassionate toward those struggling in their marriages, in their sexual identity, and in their attempts to redefine the family, where, in the words of the American Home Economics Association, a family simply consists of “two or more persons who share values and goals, and have commitments to one another over time.” Even college roommates would qualify under that watered-down definition. They certainly have common goals—a clean, cheap apartment—and commitments to one another over time—a lease until the end of the school year. Yet how many college roommates would consider theirs a “family” arrangement? In this re-definition, the AHEA is probably trying to recognize broken homes, varying types of blended families, gay marriages, and cohabitating individuals as alternative types of families. I don’t have a problem recognizing the existence of some of these lifestyles, but I do have a hard time placing them side by side with what is ideal, and that is the committed, loving marriage between a woman and a man who may or may not bear and raise children.

The feminist movement’s redefinition of family is a fair description of a reality in our society, but it should not replace the ideal institution of marriage and family, an ideal that respects lifelong commitment. Acknowledging the existence of less-than-ideal ways of doing things does not mean redefining our value system in order to make them exemplary. Even divorced individuals still value commitment and marriage. That’s why divorce and remarriage can be such painful and complicated processes. They are not painful because our society doesn’t condone them; they are painful because they go against the grain of how we are made, of what we know, deep in our being, to be true and right.

Finally, the feminist/pro-family individual does not see a male-dominant hierarchy as part of healthy and biblical family life. The pro-family movement has long been criticized for its dogmatic adherence to the “Father Knows Best” style of marriage and family, where, in the most extreme scenario, men are the ultimate authority and women merely act on their orders. Pro-family advocates fear that, if it is any other way, then we are both disobeying God’s way and pushing for a genderless society. Men and women are different, but those differences don’t mandate that only women or only men can do X, Y, or Z. Minimally, the differences mean that women physically bear children and men don’t.

Here begins one of the biggest gray areas in these movements. As soon as we start enumerating what men and women can and can’t do, we run the risk of squelching the Spirit of God at work in each individual. Sometimes women are better at nurturing than men. So what? Does that mean all women should stay home and raise their children and all men go to work all day? A major change I would like to see in society is one where it is equally acceptable for either men or women to work and equally acceptable for either men or women to stay home with the kids, if that is what they choose to do. How many men could quit their jobs midstream in their careers, stay home for several years to raise their children, and then reenter the work force as freely as they left it? They would not only get a few raised eyebrows if they tried, but they’d be criticized and most likely discriminated against as they tried to regain employment. On the other hand, women may not be able to freely reenter the work force either, but most likely they would experience a different kind of prejudice.

It’s all to say that these issues are not as black and white as the pro-family advocates or feminists make them out to be. I consider myself very different from men and don’t desire to live in a society where my sexual identity is blurred, but I just cannot live out the prescribed roles the pro-family advocates call “biblical” and “crucial to the health of society.” Nor do I want admittance to the hierarchy of power that men have designed over the centuries. So where do I fit in?

I live actively with the ambiguity; I try to be intelligent and discerning in my faith, sorting out what’s good from what’s not so good. It is not easy to grapple with issues of gender roles and family life. Both pro-family advocates and the feminist movement have identified some real problems in our society, problems that deprive women and men of their wholeness, their humanness, and their gifts. The impact of these movements demands that we look to God and trust the Holy Spirit to help us discern what is right and wrong along the way. And, we just cannot do it alone. One important way to begin this process is to do it with others. Through discussion, shared experiences, prayer, and support with others in our churches, we can begin sorting out these challenging issues and learn what God wants for our lives.